The declassified study by scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory, published in 1947, first shed light on the question of how many nuclear bombs would be needed to destroy the world. According to the study, ten to one hundred “nuclear superweapons” would be needed to end humanity, a publication reported. The apocalypse caused by these 10-100 super bombs would not be all fire and brimstone. Scientists postulated that the world's greatest destruction could come from radioactive poisons released into the Earth's atmosphere by bomb-armed uranium.
Exposure to radiation causes skyrocketing rates of cancer, birth defects, and genetic abnormalities. A 100-bomb nuclear attack could damage the entire planet, including the aggressor nation, according to a new scientific study. One of the aspects that have been hidden is a small investigation conducted by the team to identify the power they were dealing with. Seeing how unstable nuclear materials can be, the question in their minds was how many bombs would it really take to end this world? Taking into account the power of an atomic bomb and doing some calculations, the scientists gave an answer.
They said that no more than 100 atomic bombs would be needed to wipe out humanity. Not all governments can afford it because nuclear weapons require billions of dollars to build, maintain and launch them properly. The proliferation process is also risky, MIT nuclear expert Vipin Narang told me, because looking for a nuclear bomb makes a country a potential target. A country looking for nuclear bombs is often vulnerable to attack.
And with advances in nuclear technology since then, the devastation of the next nuclear attack may be much, much worse. So what is the risk of nuclear war really? After talking to more than a dozen experts familiar with the horrors of nuclear conflicts, the answer is that the possibilities are very small. Indeed, India and Pakistan are in a nuclear arms race, and historic enemies will soon patrol dangerous waters in close proximity with nuclear weapons aboard their ships. With nine countries with nuclear weapons, the document advocates a disarmament proposal that would reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world to 900 or less.
Depending on the plan chosen by the president, the command will go to US crews operating submarines that carry nuclear missiles, combat aircraft that can launch nuclear bombs, or troops that supervise intercontinental ballistic missiles on the ground. Scientists in Los Alamos understood the threat that aerial radiation would pose in the event of a nuclear war.